From 76eb1b077a44b03c95d487f68f06b6aec122b85f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simo Kinnunen Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:10:04 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Forgot why we don't force a rotation lock, added a doc explaining why so that I won't waste time thinking about it again. --- doc/WHY.md | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/WHY.md diff --git a/doc/WHY.md b/doc/WHY.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4b499a74 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/WHY.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +# Why? + +This document lists reasons for various internal decisions so that we'll hopefully never forget them (again). + +## Why not keep a rotation lock to prevent the screen from reverting to its natural position? + +Because a physical rotation would then have no effect. While STF is meant for larger device farms, we anticipate a large portion of our user base to be running STF on their local computers with the actual devices right next to them, and it would be confusing if rotation suddenly had no effect.